|
Results
and Data
The
–2 (1/8 inch) size failed to complete the impulse test.
All –2 plugs had structural failures and did not successfully
complete the one million cycle test (see Appendix B). The structural
failure occurred at the fitting o-ring cross section to the outside
of the hex pattern of the fitting. All other sizes, excluding
the –2 size, did successfully pass the impulse testing.
All of the EPCO anodized aluminum plugs passed the proof and burst
to the above stated specifications.
The
final torque values to pass the impulse, proof and burst for the
stated Zero-Leak Gold Plugs are listed in Table 2.
|
Minimum
Torque Value |
|
Zero-Leak
Gold®Plug Sizes |
Anodized
Aluminum Ft-lbs |
|
2
|
N/A
|
|
3
|
3.5
|
|
4
|
6.5
|
|
5
|
8.5
|
|
6
|
10.5
|
|
8
|
30.0
|
|
10
|
40
|
|
12
|
65
|
Table
2: Aluminum Zero-Leak Gold® Final Torque Values.
Anodized
Aluminum
Plugs |
Removal
Torque |
Proof
Testing |
Burst
Testing |
| Plug Sizes |
Removal
Torque
(ft-Ibs) |
Average
Removal
Torque (ft-Ibs) |
Proof
Pressure
(PSI) |
Proof Time
at Pressure
(sec) |
Proof
(pass/fail) |
Burst
Pressure
(PSI) |
Burst Mode
Of Failure |
Burst (pass/fail)
|
| 2 |
N/A |
N/A
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
25092 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 2 |
N/A |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
21238 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 2 |
N/A |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
20457 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 3 |
6.5 |
8.2
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
32040 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 3 |
10 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
28312 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 3 |
8 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
27987 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 4 |
15 |
12.3 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
26642 |
O-ring |
Passed |
| 4 |
9 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
28394 |
O-ring |
Passed |
| 4
|
13 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
26961 |
O-ring |
Passed |
| 5
|
12 |
14.2
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
27823 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 5
|
17.5 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
27727 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 5
|
13 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
25310 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 6
|
14.5 |
15.7
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
23744 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 6
|
13.5 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
23063 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 6
|
19 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
23340 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 8
|
39 |
33.7
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
24341 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 8
|
24 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
23845 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 8
|
38 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
22642 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 10
|
43 |
46.7
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
19571 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 10
|
50 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
19549 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 10
|
47 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
18894 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 12
|
75 |
73.7
|
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
18853 |
O-ring |
Passed |
| 12
|
80 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
18887 |
Structural |
Passed |
| 12
|
66 |
6000 |
120 |
Passed |
19023 |
Structural |
Passed |
Table
3: Aluminum Zero-Leak Gold® Proof, Burst and Removal Torque
data.
When
the impulse testing was successfully finished each plug was removed
from the manifold. Removal Torque values were recorded and listed
in Table 3. The structural failure mode listed was a failure that
occurred at the fitting o-ring cross section to the outside of
the hex pattern of the fitting. This failure caused the plug to
crack from the O-ring groove to the inside of the fitting causing
the failure (see pictures in Appendix B). There was an unknown
black residue around each plug upon the completion of the impulse
test. No leaks were observed and the residue was sent to a lab
to determine what the substance was.
The
samples were sent to SF Analytical in Milwaukee for material analysis.
The final results were inconclusive; no seal material could be
identified from the samples. The client requested all plugs be
pressurized beyond the 4:1 requirement (12,000 psi) and continue
increasing pressure until failure of the fitting or limitations
of the equipment are reached. The proof test results are also
listed in Table 3 with the burst test results.
|